ux-ui-agent-skills: 52 components and valid design tokens?
The claim“Turns Claude into a senior design architect: production-ready UI components and accessible design tokenstoken The small chunks a model reads and writes. One token is roughly three-quarters of an English word, so 100 tokens is about 75 words. Glossary · Learn more”
Live stats · checked
Review lives at rockytested.com · @RockyTested
Coding agentsAI agent An AI that takes actions in steps (runs commands, edits files, browses) instead of only chatting. Glossary · Learn more Rocky · in the lab
With vs without
With vs withoutNo with-skill pass count is on file.
No baselinebaseline The normal way of doing the same job, used as the yardstick. Rocky compares every claim against a baseline on the same machine. Glossary pass count is on file.
Usefulness is a separate question from “does the repo exist.” It needs the same task run twice. Until that A/B is published, both cells stay blank.
What the test plan says
Count the skills and component files, and check that every design-token JSON file is valid JSON. Static read only.
Four verdicts
One stamp is not the whole story. Works, Safe, Claims honest, and Provenance are four separate written calls. A missing call stays “not tested yet.”
No written call is on file. This is not a pass.
No written call is on file. This is not a pass.
No written call is on file. This is not a pass.
No written call is on file. This is not a pass.
Safety is a hard cap. If Safe is no, the Rocky Score cannot rise above 44 (grade F), even when the tool works. A blank Safe card means not tested yet, not safe. How the four verdicts roll up →
| Claim part | Measured | Result |
|---|---|---|
| The claim | Measuring… | measuring |
What it is: A skill pack that claims 52 UI components and WCAG-grade design tokens for Claude. Rocky checks the counts and that the token files actually parse. Claim source →
Results coming. Here’s what Rocky will measure
- Skill count
- Component files vs the claimed 52
- Whether every design-token JSON parses
Count the skills and component files, and check that every design-token JSON file is valid JSON. Static read only.
Sneak peek
Sneak peek- Found 26 skills and 48 component files, against the claim of 52 components. All 30 JSON token files parse (30 of 30).
Claim ledger
Claim ledgerEvery distinct claim in the pitch gets a row: what was said, what the command said back. 1 claim on the ledger: 1 not measured. No separate ledger file yet, so these rows are the review's claim list only. “Not tested” means that claim has no measurement.
- ? Not tested
“Turns Claude into a senior design architect: production-ready UI components and accessible design tokens” source
🔍 Coverage: Not stated yet. Rocky only lists the parts a run actually checked.
⚗️ Unproven usefulness. Counting and parsing can settle what the repo claims. It can't settle whether the thing actually helps — that takes an A/B run (same task with and without it), which hasn't happened yet.
Rocky's take
Rocky's take is drafted only from measured results: what the tool is good for, and where it will fail you. Until those results exist, this stays blank. Nothing here is guessed.
Where this repo comes from
Where this repo comes fromProvenance is age, authors, commitcommit One saved version of a repo's code. Rocky pins the exact commit so anyone can rerun the same code. Glossary · Learn more bursts, and where the README sends you. It is published only from commands Rocky ran. Nothing is guessed, so this section stays blank until that file exists.
Results, charted
Rocky draws these at build time from the run's own numbers. Hover or read the hidden table for exact values. Verdict colors: green holds, yellow stretched, red failed, teal measuring.
| Group | Series | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Contents | Skills | 26 |
| Contents | Component files | 48 |
| Contents | Claimed components | 52 |
| Contents | Valid JSON | 30 |
Score
Not scored yet. A Rocky Score is a rollup of measured subscores only. This review does not have one, and no grade is filled in to hold the place.
Rerun it yourself
Rerun it yourself📦 When the test is done, the exact scripts, raw results and a copy-paste prompt for your own AI agent will appear here.
Repo & thanks
Repo & thanks- ux-ui-agent-skills: Turn Claude into a senior design architect: DTCG tokens, 52 components, WCAG 2.2 AA-AAA, 138 design systems, any-framework code, and 50 objective gates that fail the build instead of faking success. Built by @plugin87. Thank you!
Where the claim was posted
Transforms Claude into a Senior Design Architect generating production-ready UI components and accessible design tokens. https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills
Counts as of (Rocky's last check)
Where else this repo is talked about
On X: 1 posts linking the repo
Posts from to , in several languages. Found with X search for links to the repo; more may exist. Oldest first:
- Earliest we found @tom_doerr Transforms Claude into a Senior Design Architect generating production-ready UI components and accessible design tokens. https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills❤️ 495 · 🔁 54 · 📊 25K open
All 1 posts, oldest first
- Earliest we found @tom_doerr Transforms Claude into a Senior Design Architect generating production-ready UI components and accessible design tokens. https://github.com/plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills❤️ 495 · 🔁 54 · 📊 25K open
Ran it yourself?
Ran it yourself?Share your rerun
- Download the rerun bundle above.
- Run it, or paste the prompt into your AI agent.
- Post your
results.json(a gist is fine) and reply to @RockyTested with the link.
Rocky reruns or spot-checks every submission before it counts. Verified reruns will appear here with your handle.
🏅 Helper leaderboard
No verified reruns yet. Be the first!
Street cred goes to people whose reruns Rocky verified: same bundle, raw output included, numbers re-checked. How it works
Badge & stat card
Put the verdict badge in a README or post. It always links back to the measured results.
[](https://rockytested.com/reviews/plugin87-ux-ui-agent-skills/)
Stat card (1200×630). This is what shows up when the review is shared on X.
Machine-readable: /v1/reviews/plugin87-ux-ui-agent-skills · Words with a dotted underline have a quick explanation: hover or tap. Glossary